Real-world response times for K3, DeepSeek V4, GLM-5, Qwen-Plus & Doubao Pro. Make data-driven decisions for your AI infrastructure.
Free ToolMeasured in real production environments. Lower is better.
| Model | TTFT (ms) | Throughput (tok/s) | Context Window | Speed Rating | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3 | 180-350 | 85-120 | 200K | Very Fast | |
| DeepSeek V4 | 200-400 | 75-110 | 128K | Fast | |
| Doubao Pro | 250-500 | 90-130 | 32K | Very Fast (short) | |
| Qwen-Plus | 300-600 | 60-90 | 128K | Medium | |
| GLM-5 | 400-800 | 55-85 | 128K | Medium |
* TTFT = Time To First Token. Data averaged from 1000+ production calls via TokenEase gateway, July 2026.
Estimate total response time based on your use case.
Longer prompts require more pre-processing. Models with larger context windows (K3: 200K) handle long inputs more efficiently relative to their capacity.
This is the biggest factor. A 4000-token response at 100 tok/s takes 40 seconds. Streaming responses help perceived latency.
Reasoning models (like DeepSeek V4 with extended thinking) have higher TTFT but often produce higher-quality outputs in fewer total tokens.
Peak hours can increase latency by 2-3x. TokenEase load-balances across multiple provider endpoints to maintain consistent performance.
Always use streaming for UX-critical applications. TTFT drops to 200-400ms, giving users immediate feedback.
max_tokens to prevent unexpectedly long generationsAll latency data is collected from production traffic through the TokenEase API gateway. Methodology:
One API key. All models. Real-time latency monitoring built in.
Get Free API Key ($1 Credit)No credit card required. 1M tokens. 14 days.