Let's start with hard numbers. Here's what 1 million output tokens costs across the major models in August 2026:
| Model | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | vs GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 (OpenAI) | $2.50 | $10.00 | Baseline |
| Claude 4 (Anthropic) | $3.00 | $15.00 | 1.5x more |
| DeepSeek V4 | $0.50 | $2.00 | 5x cheaper |
| GLM-5.1 | $0.50 | $1.50 | 6.7x cheaper |
| Qwen-Plus | $0.40 | $1.20 | 8.3x cheaper |
| Kimi K3 | $0.50 | $2.00 | 5x cheaper |
| Doubao Pro | $0.50 | $2.00 | 5x cheaper |
When it comes to writing code, DeepSeek V4 doesn't just match GPT-5 — it beats it. With a 90.2 HumanEval score (vs GPT-5's 88.7), DeepSeek consistently generates more correct, efficient code.
Best for: Code generation, debugging, technical documentation, math problems
Price: $0.50/M input, $2.00/M output — 5x cheaper than GPT-5
If your users speak multiple languages — especially Chinese, Japanese, or Korean — GLM-5.1 is unmatched. It was trained natively on multilingual data, not just translated from English. The result? Natural, culturally-aware responses in 8+ languages.
Best for: Global apps, Asian markets, cross-border e-commerce, multilingual support
Price: $0.50/M input, $1.50/M output — 6.7x cheaper than GPT-5
At just $0.40 per million input tokens, Qwen-Plus is the cheapest top-tier model available. But don't let the price fool you — it scores 83.5 on MMLU (general knowledge) and handles business documents exceptionally well thanks to its training on Alibaba's massive e-commerce corpus.
Best for: High-volume processing, budget-conscious projects, document analysis, structured data extraction
Price: $0.40/M input, $1.20/M output — 8.3x cheaper than GPT-5
Kimi's 128K token context window means you can send entire books, legal contracts, or codebases in a single API call. No chunking. No context loss. No complex RAG pipelines. If you work with long documents, Kimi eliminates an entire category of engineering complexity.
Best for: Legal tech, research analysis, code review, any document > 50K tokens
Price: $0.50/M input, $2.00/M output — 5x cheaper than GPT-5
Built by ByteDance (TikTok's parent company), Doubao was trained on billions of viral social media posts, video scripts, and marketing campaigns. It understands what makes content engaging — not just grammatically correct.
Best for: Social media content, marketing copy, video scripts, email campaigns
Price: $0.50/M input, $2.00/M output — 5x cheaper than GPT-5
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | DeepSeek | GLM | Qwen | Kimi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval (Coding) | 88.7 | 90.2 | 84.6 | 84.6 | 82.1 |
| MMLU (General Knowledge) | 88.9 | 86.4 | 85.2 | 83.5 | 84.8 |
| MATH (Mathematics) | 79.4 | 82.1 | 78.5 | 76.2 | 75.8 |
| Chinese Language | 72.3 | 81.5 | 89.1 | 87.6 | 85.2 |
| Long Context (128K) | 96.3 | 91.7 | 89.4 | 88.1 | 94.2 |
| Creative Writing | 91.2 | 78.3 | 82.1 | 80.5 | 79.8 |
500K input + 100K output tokens/day
| Model | Daily Cost | Monthly Cost |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 | $2.25 | $67.50 |
| Qwen-Plus | $0.32 | $9.60 |
| DeepSeek | $0.45 | $13.50 |
200K input + 500K output tokens/day (heavy output usage)
| Model | Daily Cost | Monthly Cost |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 | $5.50 | $165.00 |
| DeepSeek | $1.10 | $33.00 |
100K input + 200K output tokens/day
| Model | Daily Cost | Monthly Cost |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 | $2.25 | $67.50 |
| Doubao Pro | $0.45 | $13.50 |
No. If you're already using the OpenAI API, switching to any of these models takes literally one line of code:
from openai import OpenAI
# Before: OpenAI
# client = OpenAI(api_key="sk-openai-key")
# After: TokenEase (same API, 5x cheaper)
client = OpenAI(
api_key="your-tokenease-key",
base_url="https://tokenease.io/v1"
)
# Same code, just change the model name
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="deepseek", # or "glm", "qwen", "kimi", "doubao"
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
)
The API format is identical. The response format is identical. The only difference is the model name and the price.
Yes. All five models have 99.9%+ uptime SLA via TokenEase. DeepSeek, GLM, and Qwen are used by Fortune 500 companies in China. Kimi powers multiple legal tech platforms. Doubao is deployed across ByteDance's own products serving billions of users.
For most tasks, no. For coding and math, quality actually increases. For creative writing, GPT-5 still has a slight edge — but at 5x the price. The smart approach: use Qwen/DeepSeek for 80% of tasks and GPT-5 only for the 20% where it truly matters.
Yes. TokenEase gives you $1 free credit with just an email — no credit card required. That's enough for 1-2 million tokens of testing, depending on the model.
TokenEase acts as a proxy — your data goes to the model provider just like it would with OpenAI. For sensitive applications, all major Chinese providers offer enterprise tiers with data isolation and on-premise deployment options.
You don't need to switch everything at once. Here's a proven approach:
Get $1 free credit. Test all 5 models side-by-side with your actual data.
Coding / debugging → DeepSeek V4 ($0.50/M in, $2.00/M out)
Multilingual / Chinese → GLM-5.1 ($0.50/M in, $1.50/M out)
Budget-conscious → Qwen-Plus ($0.40/M in, $1.20/M out)
Long documents → Kimi K3 ($0.50/M in, $2.00/M out)
Marketing / social → Doubao Pro ($0.50/M in, $2.00/M out)
All via: https://tokenease.io/v1
All with: pip install openai
TokenEase provides unified access to DeepSeek V4, GLM-5.1, Qwen-Plus, Kimi K3, and Doubao Pro through a single OpenAI-compatible API. One key, five models, 5x cheaper.